Vulnerability ?

topic posted Fri, February 8, 2008 - 11:18 PM by  Aschleigh
Vulnerability is the capacity or susceptibility to being hurt. The word vulnerable is also synonymous with the words openness and exposure. When a person is truly vulnerable there is an unobstructed entrance or view to the persons heart, being and soul. In the strongest or most enlightened person there is no protecting or concealing cover because the person needs none. Such people carry themselves in full view of others because they are not afraid of being hurt, because they are not afraid to suffer.

The most important key to finding love
is found in our willingness
and ability to be vulnerable.

Our ego (separate self) is that very edifice that we have fabricated to protect our hearts. It is the wall that all beings create on this planet to protect themselves from being hurt. We have incarnated onto this planet where all beings have suffered the pain of separation but we are promised salvation. Pain and suffering are Gods way of telling us we are doing something wrong with our life, something inexact with our consciousness. Pain and suffering have a purpose and when we can get in touch with that purpose our path in life tends to straighten itself out. Or at least we can eventually learn which way to go to begin our journey that one day will take us back to the full light of happiness.

One way out of suffering
is to see that it has been given to us
by life's greatest teacher.

Hurt is something our beings naturally feel. Hurt is the appropriate response of the human heart when attacked or misunderstood. When we betray the innocent and vulnerable nature of the pure heart we cause hurt. When we are born we have a great capacity to be hurt. Babies and young children are totally at the mercy of their environment, they are totally vulnerable, but slowly loose this after years of being repeatedly hurt and misunderstood. We slowly loose the vulnerability of being as we erect our ego or mental separate self. When Christ said that we needed to be born again he was referring to the reversing of this process.

When we betray the innocent and vulnerable
nature of the pure heart we cause hurt.
The separate mind is the betrayer of the
universe of heart and true being.

When we are vulnerable we put away the fancy airs we put on and drop our self-image, which is always hoping to look a little better than we actually feel. Any kind of spiritual self-image automatically blocks our vulnerability thus cutting off the heart and blocking us from the very thing that we want - love. When we do expose ourselves we become psychologically naked. This only happens when our defenses are down, when we are not worried that others will attack or judge us. Then we can be just who we are. But this is difficult because that is exactly what happens when we just are. People want us to be or feel or think something different. The paradox of vulnerability is that, though we can only be vulnerable when we are not worried that others will judge us, being vulnerable means openness to such an attack. In human relations no situation is completely safe when it comes to our vulnerabilities. In the beginning, when we first learn to open ourselves, it is prudent to pick the most gentle and caring people we can find to open our hearts with.

Christ's instructions for being born again were clear.
What he was talking about was that childlike quality of pure vulnerability.
This is the space of pure being.

That is why it takes courage and strength to be our naked vulnerable self. The path of vulnerability is for the strongest and it is for the most humble; those who remain closest to the ground because they are not secretly hoping to look a little better than they are. Humble vulnerable people do not walk around with a self image to protect, they feel what they feel and they share what they feel without shame. As we become more and more practiced in our vulnerability, our hearts expand and grow. The heart can grow so large and strong that eventually it cannot be hurt too badly. That is the strongest person, totally open to whatever comes. This is actually the ego less space, having no expectations and laying no demands on the universe. We open ourselves without fear and take whatever comes.

"To treasure vulnerable love is the first law of a pure heart."--Christopher Hills

After many years or incarnations of being closed in the heart, being vulnerable to other human beings can be terrifying. When we fall in love the first thing we do is open our heart, exposing our sensitivities, vulnerabilities; giving power to someone to wound or reject us with their insensitivity's or selfishness. This is why so many people are afraid to fall in love. In any situation, until the heart is used to being open, vulnerability initially feels like our heart is going to come right up through our throats.

When we first open the heart a river of feelings is released which swamps the mind and it's habitual defenses. We feel overwhelmed because our usual cool control is lost. The coolness of the separate personality is swept away as familiar ground moves from under our feet. Though most fear this moment, it is such a release, such a lightening of our load. Our real self is freed from the iron grip our ego normally holds over heart consciousness. Most egos are so rooted in their separateness that nothing short of the full fires of romance will due to reduce oneself to the vulnerable self. And then we usually make ourselves vulnerable to the one and only person who we have dared to fall in love with still excluding others; this thus makes our vulnerability slightly incomplete.

The head never really allows the heart to love.
Our fear of pain is stronger than our love of love.

We cannot begin to flow towards another person or towards our own higher or inner being until the psychic skin covering the heart is removed. The risk is great when we open because once we enter that vulnerable space, our head and it's games disappear. We lose our ego's protection, that hateful sense of separation is released and we feel that good feeling flowing. We crave that feeling of aliveness that comes from opening up. We feel safe once we are in this space. A welling up feeling fills our insides, a warmth and sense of caring or being cared for.

The pure in heart treasure vulnerability above all vibrations. A person tuned to love cherishes this space because he or she knows intuitively that this is what is most needed in human relations.

The purest heart has no mind.
The pure in heart is all heart.

The gift of vulnerable love far transcends the mental sharing of spiritual concepts and stories, no matter how profound they are. The head normally can't wait to advise. The heart, when listening to the inner world of another, listens, listens more, asks questions that draw a person out further, and thus shows a loving interest in the inner world of the other. Such a heart actually has the ability to get into the inner world of another because the heart feels and experiences no separation. When listening perfectly to the being of another, our being has the capacity to commune, to be at-one-with that other. The reunion of beings beyond the normal separate space of ego consciousness is a very beautiful thing when it happens.

My tears flow.
My being opens totally.

Vulnerability should not be confused with mental openness. It is very possible that someone could share the most intimate details of their life and still not be vulnerable. The difference lies in the vibration. Often in the beginning of relationships, people find it easier to be vulnerable about hurts and pains from the past, when in fact their real vulnerability has something more to do with feelings being generated in the moment. Expressing love or sexual attractions is often the most vulnerable issue at hand. Expressing these feelings leaves us exposed to others. When we share these feelings our relationships are quickly taken to deep and often intimate levels. And in these spaces, though we may suffer, we grow.

The purpose of our life here on this earth is to contact our being,
expand and grow our being by coming into a direct relationship with
the essence of our heart's true nature. And what is this true nature?
The heart is the vulnerability of being.

The most fascinating aspect of the Internet and digital communication is that people feel a lot more free to be vulnerable. They let their hair down and are more willing to be who and what they are or want to be. People are more willing to open up their dark secrets and confide in complete strangers. Though in fact few people are using their Internet connection as a spiritual tool for open hearted sharing, a growing network of therapists are beginning a great work of helping people heal from mental and emotional traumas that are so prevalent in human existence. They are finding it an incredible tool in assisting people open up and share what they are really thinking and feeling. This is something most people have an incredible difficulty with in open society and even with our friends communication is rarely taken onto the vulnerable level.

Mark Sircus Ac., OMD : an American living in Brazil, a doctor of Oriental and Biogenic medicine, a revolutionary and radical psychologist, as well as a body worker. Visit his site World Psychology which opens up a vast new framework with which to view ourselves, our lives, lovers, friends, children, work, education, medicine, ecology, sexuality - taking us in a modern way to the roots of our existence.
posted by:
Aschleigh
Los Angeles
  • Re: Vulnerability ?

    Sat, February 9, 2008 - 12:01 AM
    Whoa! I've been contemplating vulnerability this week too. I posted a blog on it... highlighting an area in my life that has been targeted.... a place i feel vulnerable. Thank you for this thoughtful insight on vulnerability. I'm gonna past it to my blog.

    ;)
    alegria~sita
    • Re: Vulnerability ?

      Sat, February 9, 2008 - 4:06 PM
      I guess this is why I love my tribes .. I can be ooooooooooooooooooooooopen ..no fear! : )
      although Im pretty open in person too once I warm up... a little too much sometimes my friends seem to think,
      but Im finally comfortable being no one other than me.... vulnerable, honest, open and a bit nutty...lol

      thanks for the post!
      • .
        .
        offline 37

        Re: Vulnerability ?

        Sat, February 9, 2008 - 6:19 PM
        I like this post.. it has been one of the longest ones I have not mind reading a through z.

        cheers to vulnerability!

        May we drink of the cup until it runneth over our thirsty mouths!

        gulp gulp...

        ..... burp! (oops)
        • Re: Vulnerability ?

          Sat, February 9, 2008 - 6:52 PM
          Yes, it's a lot to ingest. But I need to learn it, use it. I want to be totally me, open vulnerable in the world. I am working at it.
  • .
    .
    offline 37

    Re: Vulnerability ?

    Wed, February 13, 2008 - 10:18 AM
    ..been thinking some more on vulnerability.. why there seems to be a lack of amoungs many in the US..

    ..I wonder if it is because the US has a warrior culture.. that of domination and submission.. where the paradigm is to "watch out for number one" in a defensive competitive way..

    I have heard politicians say "If you got problems: don't mention them, half of the people won't care, and the other half will be happy you have them"

    I imagine it would be difficult to "stick out one's neck" in vulnerability if one thinks one will bet demolished or overpowered, emotionally hurt ..etc..

    I think compassionate mindfulness breaks this paradigm of "violence"..where things are seen in terms of seeing humans basic goodness and focusing on values such as common celebration of health, freedom, self expression, hapiness and such. .and relate to people in this "community" level.. not appealing to individualism..which has the risk of separating people and thusly likely making it hard for empathy to abide...

    Also, in compassioante mindfulness, one acknowledges the responsibility of one's welfare, emotional and mental, within one self.. thereby taking the power in other's and reclaiming it for ourselves.. this is very empowering.. because other's can no longer hurt one because they never could hurt to beging with.. it was all an illusion.. only One has most or all of the power to hurt ourselves..

    so knowing this and practicing this personal responsibility on emotions, one can easily make these seeminly "vulnerable gestures" and one can be surprice that it disrobes the "opponent" (although they are no longer opponents..they are simply people in need with misguided tactics perhaps).

    The more I think about it.. the more I value vulnerability..

    Thank you VULNERABILITY!
    • Re: Vulnerability ?

      Sat, March 22, 2008 - 2:16 AM
      do you not think it is possible to be too vulnerable? making other people responsible for your feelings? martyring yourself... letting people walk over you and take what they want from you, use you?

      maybe i'm confused........ in fact, i think i am. what's the difference between 'conscious open' vulnerability, and victimhood?
      • Re: Vulnerability ?

        Sat, March 22, 2008 - 2:46 AM
        I don't see a link between victimhood and vulnerability at all.

        Other people are not responsibly for my feelings. I don't want to be used.
        I want to be open to the feeling of vulnerabilty, not closed .
        • Re: Vulnerability ?

          Sat, March 29, 2008 - 9:17 AM
          Aschleigh...I see it as a respect connection (while being open). Fear of being victimized is the connection for victimhood I think.
      • .
        .
        offline 37

        examples of Vulnerability

        Sat, March 22, 2008 - 2:19 PM
        Cloé, I think i understand the association of vulnerability to victimhood in certain cases.

        Here are some examples of vulnerability that has nothing to do with victimhood:

        --a guy asking a woman out on a date is risking feeling rejection and thusly places himself vulnerable to that upon asking her out.

        --Soldiers going to war accept feeling and being vulnerable.

        --Teenager's saying "NO" to peerpressure adopt a vulnerable position with respect to their peers in asserting their integrity to not go along.

        --Classroom students raising their hands accept feeling vulnerable, in attempt to get some ideas clarified.

        --A wife asking for divorce accepts being vulnerable as a single woman, without financial support of a husband, in the hope for a better life.

        --A 50 year old macho husband shows his vulnerability to his wife "he is scared" as he decides to go for a colonoscopy.

        Maybe you would like us to explore a particular example you may have in mind, Cloé.
      • .
        .
        offline 37
        What you suggest, Cloé, I believe to the the norm in our society: making other people responsible for your feelings. We are not taught to be responsible for our emotions...and we often get confused as to the source of our emotions.

        For example, someone may say:
        -- "you calling me 'sweet' maked me feel happy"
        -- "you calling me 'sweet and sour' made me feel aprehensive"
        -- "you calling me 'sour' made me feel sad"

        when saying such things, the responsibility of the emotions felt by one is placed on the other. One is characterized as being the passive of feeling the emotions, and the other person as active in causing the emotions.

        It is more clear to understand that the words are part of our environment, but we choose to respond to the words in such way as to make us feel what we did.

        If we accept responsibility, we might say, instead:

        -- "when you called me 'sweet', I felt happy"
        -- "when you called me 'sweet and sour', I felt aprehensive"
        -- "when you called me 'sour', I felt sad"

        So the responsibility is not on the words someone else says, but on ourselves. We could have reacted in a variety of ways to those word.
        When someone calls pne 'sweet', one may feel elated, irked, sad, confused, angry, tranquil, surpriced, infuriated..etc.. all depending on how one reacts to the words.

        but since this responsibility is often not adopted, we often get confused as to what caused the feelings.. and we tend to think someone or something "out there" caused it.. not us.. but we are infact the ones who felt the feelings and who's psychological state dictates what we would feel.. not so much the observations we have of the world.

        So vulnerability can be expressed in full ownership and responsibility of emotions, without subjugating others responsible as to those emotions.

        It is possible to use "vulnerability" as a passive agressive martyr, but that is a rather weird way to use vulnerability..perhaps a perversion of it... It's a rare merge of the two, in my experience.
        • thanks Alexyana, that was informative..

          it seems simple, i almost feel funny asking... making myself 'vulnerable' by asking. lol

          i guess it is really important to me NOt to make other people responsible for my feelings, but as a result of that, i probably isolate myself in unnecessary ways. like, for example, when sad or hurt.

          i wonder, how would you, for example.. ;) tell someone that you were feeling anguish when thinking about them?

          the way you put it, it seems simple, but seems to me when you are discussing sensitive intricate emotional situations, it isn't always so clear.

          i have a hard time finding that line. i'd like to know more about it.
          • .
            .
            offline 37
            Cloé, I am glad you found my response informative for you, it took some uncasual energy on my part.. but I sensed that others might find these thoughts useful in their lives.

            I gather that you make a concious effort to be responsible for not making other people responsible. Is this accurate? To me, this is a heavy burden because you do not control how other people will judge what you say, what you do, how you feel.. there are people who automatically feel that someone is blaming them, making them feel sorry, shame, embarrased fear.. etc.. when in reality, you are just expressing your emotions or thoughts.

            I feel concern that you are self sensoring yourself, that you miss important and valuable opportunities to self express yourself. I feel sad at the thought. I sense that alot of women tend to do this.. sacrificing their needs for the sake of others. I wonder if other people even value that, or simply take those sacrifices for granted.. thereby putting youself in a resentful situation..

            I am a big believer in expressing yourself. It take courage, and vulnerability, but way worth the effort.. other's will appreciate it also because you are comming from a very personal space to relate... I sense that you may empathize with more power this way also.

            I hope my statements do not presume something about you that is incorrect.. i am simply speaking from my first person prespective, telling you my imaginations into the subject. Please take only what rings true for you, and disregards things that are off target.

            If you wonder how I could express anguish when thinking about someone, well first, I would want to listen to the other persone express themselves emotionally towards the subject.. or the background or context in which you wish to relate this anguish.. then empathize with their frame of reference, their viewpoint, their world view.. this may take a few mintues to a few days..perhaps month--depending on the situation.. if it is a divorce after decades of marraige for example or simply a stranger or something in between.

            When the other person feels that they have been heard, and understood, and empathized with, then they will be open to listen to you, hopefully empathetically.. you may want to lay a preface that what you are going to express is not to make them defensive or responsible, that you just want to be heard and understood.. you do not ask of advise, or judgement.. you simply want them to listen to you.. no words need to be utter in their part (this is just an example).

            Then you can proceed in expressing yourself in the first person with relation to your emotions and such..

            I don't see how this model may not work with most people.
            Do you imagine that this kind of example may work in your situation?
            • you are very insightful, i appreciate that. don't feel like you have to expend a great deal of energy though, whatever comes is more than was there before.

              hmm.. responsible for not making other people responsible... maybe yes. more so with certain people.

              for example, i did something bad... something this person probably will not forgive me for. he knows, because i cannot lie. we never really discussed it, because our relationship is... limited. however, we have a connection, that feels deep, and special.
              the thing i did... i can beat myself up about it, which i do anyway, but i'd rather not. the thing is, it's kind of.. a healing process. it is something i struggle with in my life, that i am just learning, a little at a time how to overcome. i behave in ways that hurt myself and others, because that is what i learned when i was very young. and i read a lot of books, and meditate, and reflect and study myself and little by little, it comes unraveled and i understand more and more, let go more and more, so that now i still do those things, but i have awareness now, and i feel like soon i won't do them anymore. it is getting better.
              but that doesn't change the fact that what i did, i don't think he can forgive. he will not be angry, he is a kind person. but i don't think he will want to be near me anymore... this makes me very sad. i think maybe, i can try to explain, tell him why i do those things, that it's getting better, and it hurts me a great deal as well. but... why bother... really, why should i bother to try and explain, if i'm not sure it will make a difference, if i can't promise it will never happen again.
              to talk about it, that would be making myself vulnerable. not talking about it... i just accept the pain. let it be. but maybe it feels like less pain. if i try to explain... expose myself, and it makes no difference, that would be more painful. better to just let him think i do it on purpose. not complain, not try to change his mind. if he wants to see me, he will come see me. it isn't up to me if he wants to talk to me or not. if he comes, then he will have already forgiven me i think, and it will be ok to explain. if not...there is nothing i can do. chasing him would just make it worse, he needs to make his own choices. i just let him go. even if it makes feel me very sad.

              so.. in that situation, which is the good and the bad kind of vulnerable?
              • .
                .
                offline 37
                I was in a similar situation, where I knew my beloved would perhaps not love me because I did something that she would not approve of and was very importnat to her.

                I decided to tell her because I did not want her to live in an fantasy world with regards to myself. I wanted to know that she loved me with my "faults" and not some "facade" of me--some ideal guy. I wish it was an act of courage but it was one of despair because I feared she was loving a ghost and not me, and this thought haunted me... perhaps my fear of not being loved was greater than my inspiration that I was still very lovable and that she was very loving of me.

                She decide to love me anyway, despite the tremendous hurt she incurred upon my telling her my "fault."

                In the end, I feel more human, I know I am loved for who I am and not an illusion, and I love her deeply for being level headed that I am not perfect etc..

                I did make myself vulnerable in telling her everything about my "faulter" knowing she would perhaps rebuke me but, in the end, she saw me as human and that I did still loved her, enough to not want to be dishonest to her.. perhaps she felt respected and placed in high esteem because I was not playing games with her mind and heart.. etc..

                Perhaps I could have just kept it to myself, and not repeat the "error" and realize that she still loves me because I have not changed really.. it was just one act of "error".. and perhaps it could have been a loving act to spare her the greivances of my disclosure.

                This is a very personal choice.
                I would not dare say your vulnerability would be a good or bad thing ... you are the ultimate judge about that..
                I would pray that your friend is compassionate towards you, it seems that you are trying your hardest to do your best...

                I think it is a saying from Joseph Campbell, "it is the imperfections in life that are most lovable".

                I sense that what I told you does not help.. but perhaps muddies the waters.. but perhaps this is a requirement for a clear view in the near future...

                I guess what you might want to consider is the intentions for disclosing yourself? what is the purpose for you or for your friend? what would your friend want of you, would they wish to know to not know?

                If you do not know, perhaps you can ask in a hypothetical kind of way.
                I suppose this may touch on honesty and integrity and authenticity.. with regards to honesty.. I would think you may want to "do no harm" or least harm.. and least harm to others more so than yourself.. so perhaps you should err on the side of your friends and love ones and not towards yourself..

                although I have to say..with compassionate understanding and empathy, I do not see why both of you cannot get your needs met. It may take alot of energy.. but i suspect it is possible to satisfy both of you.
        • "For example, someone may say:
          -- "you calling me 'sweet' maked me feel happy"
          -- "you calling me 'sweet and sour' made me feel aprehensive"
          -- "you calling me 'sour' made me feel sad" "

          Do you not think some of these could be actual statements of being vulnerable?
          For example, if I say "you calling me "sweet and sour" made me feel aprehensive"
          could be heard and meant that one is exposing their own trigger....one they need to work on....but one that is exposed and open nonetheless.

          I agree that feelings and thoughts are our own and no one is responsible for our feelings, however I do not agree that responsibility in all of those statements are putting the responsibility on the "other".

          Translations could be:

          You calling me sweet made me smile, I love _______ about you
          You calling me sweet n sour. I heard _____. That scares me.
          You calling me "sour" hurt. I am sour because.......__________.

          That way it's an ongoing communication, which is being open imho. Dunno if those are any better but have found that those help. Word choice and thought patterns are key.
    • Re: Vulnerability ?

      Sat, March 29, 2008 - 9:16 AM
      "..I wonder if it is because the US has a warrior culture.. that of domination and submission.. where the paradigm is to "watch out for number one" in a defensive competitive way.. "

      I blame our culture and for myself, I notice conditioning and charts.... hellfire at times.

      Then again, warriors were some of the most well-respected goddess's I've ever read about so maybe it's a slew of things.

      Culturally it's about power. Power gets demonstrated throughout. Another way of putting the warrior culture/dominance.
  • Re: Vulnerability ?

    Sat, March 29, 2008 - 9:13 AM
    This is a great post.

    Thanks.

    Somehow I needed to read it today.

    Vulnerability is very real. Being open to being devastated is probably the most scary concept many of us face. The fact is that it's demonstrated in so many ways, being angry, being closed or resentful, being distant, being shelled or walled with soooooo many things that inhibit the deepest of experiences. Yet, still it's a hurdle to overcome.

    To let go. To just be. To say "I don't like this" be it because of past or present reasons (scars, thoughts whatever) and let that out to a partner is probably one of the most difficult things I've ever done in my life.

    I'm willing to be vulnerable but damn it if I'm not struggling to do that with consciousness and kindness.
    • .
      .
      offline 37

      To let go. To just be.

      Sat, March 29, 2008 - 2:26 PM
      <<Being open to being devastated is probably the most scary concept many of us face. >>

      Tia, I'm agreeing entirely on what you express.. I like the way you put things.. very profound.

      on being open to being devastated.. I am imagining the monsters symbols of death and destructions in tibetan art.. that we all seem to rekon with sooner or later..

      thans for your wonderful thoughts..
      • Re: To let go. To just be.

        Sat, March 29, 2008 - 3:27 PM
        Thanks Alex for the compliment. I think of the Tibetan art with this too. It is death of self in a way. A self we've concocted either consciously or unconsciously.

Recent topics in "Conscious Relating"